Another Blow to the Bill of Rights? One Step Closer to Shariah

The TSA, that friendly hands-on branch of the Department of Homeland Security, is ordered to closely inspect every airline traveller.  Even CAIR, the Muslim Brotherhood's storefront cover, is crying out for exclusions to the full-body scan and/or the full-body pat-down, which apparently violates shariah law concerning Muslim women by allowing intimate contact from, or observation by, an infidel. Thankfully, murdering one's own daughter still seems to be still OK with Allah.

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Nothing about airplanes in the 4th Amendment, you'll notice.  But, in all fairness to the authors of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, nothing was ever said about requiring an elected official to provide documentation of birth, degrees, or grade transcripts, either.  For that matter, the term "competence" nowhere appears in the Constitution.  Lucky for us, eh?
So, let's endure full searches of every potential airline passenger, including all elected and appointed government officials.  One never can tell what Joe Biden might be transporting in his underwear, and don't even think about Barney Frank's man thong.  Oddly, 87-year-old Granny Bess from Okanogan seems to fit the profile of a terror suspect to Sec'y Clownitano et.al., as does little 9-year-old Timmy Swensen from Warroad, Minnesota.  You must remember, airline travel is voluntary, and if it takes scans or "touching your junk" to keep even one maniac from blowing up another three thousand innocent people, then oh, well.  It's rather like taking a pre-employment drug screen or a roadside breathylizer test:  a nuisance, to be sure, but a necessity given the tools allowable.  So take the train, drive, charter a bus or a boat.  You are free to choose your preferred method of travel, but just one lucky extremist can wreak considerable and irreparable damage upon thousands.  Personally, I'd prefer to drive:  I can "carry" and remain able to defend myself and my family, at least at close range; a box-cutter being no match for a well-kept Glock.  Gee, maybe if we were all allowed to "carry" on flights.......naahh, never happen.

The point is that jihadists are actively and resolutely seeking the means to duplicate and improve upon the attacks of 9/11/01, and they will continue relentlessly to seek new means of mass murder: ala the Terminator, they will not stop until We. Are. All. Dead.  To them, it is YOU who is deserving of a gruesome death, even if it means blowing themselves to confetti in the process.  The Muslim concept of "martyrdom" is vastly different from the Judeo-Christian concept.  But our problem lies in the hard, cold fact that the jihadists will use grannies and infants or whomever they can in order to carry out their malignant, satanic plottings, so we must endure these invasive precautions until violent jihadism is absolutely repudiated and abjured by "moderate Muslims," or until the last jihadist is sent to his just reward, which will more likely involve brimstone and pitchforks than it will 6 dozen virgins.  Ominously, one of their own has said, "You may have the watches, but we have the time."

Like so many other cancers, radiation seems to be jihadism's only cure: exceptionally high doses of radiation.  Personally, I'm tying a pork chop around my neck before I go to the airport.